Will-O-Wisp vs Board of County Commissioners for Park County; and aSkag – Updates

The People v. Park County Board of Commissioners – A heavy industrial solid waste disposal operation is not consistent with land use requirements for a planned unit development (PUD)

Trellis Law provides all documents related to Case No. 2024CV030019. You have to sign up for the service.

More precisely, this case is filed as below:

On January 23, 2025, District Court Judge Amanda Hunter issued the following order:

Therefore, it is ordered:

  1. The Park County Board of County Commission’s approval of the Final Application in Resolution No. 2024-09 is reversed.
  2. The court enters a permanent injunction prohibiting aSkag from operating the Waste Transfer Station on the site approved in Resolution No. 2024-09.

In a nutshell, Judge Hunter ruled that a single-use Planned Unit Development (PUD) is inconsistent with a PUD’s defined purpose under state or county regulations. The ruling further addressed “Spot Zoning,” concluding, ” Under the guise of the PUD statute and regulations, the county unlawfully spot-zoned an industrial use in a residential zone.”

The defendant, aSkag LLC, has filed a motion to suspend Judge Hunter’s ruling to allow time for an appeal.

aSkag Motion for Suspension of Judgment – Click to open
aSkag LLC – Articles of Organization – Click to open
Judge Hunter’s Ruling – Click to open

Prior posts on the aSkag/Shirley Solid Waste dilemma:

The Shirley Dilemma

The Shirley Dilemma – Part II

The Shirley (aSkag) Decision

Leave a Reply